Get our most popular stories once a week!
Even young ones are suffering because of this economic crisis that verdict financial crisis. More..."
Posted by Jonas Z in Economic Crisis Hits Schools
muruch posted in Free Association: Sound of Silence
fratman1906 posted in There's No Place Like Home: A History of House Ball Culture
zumbi1165 posted in Silence Broken: How Not to Spoil Obama's Victory
June 5, 2008
Not Everyone's On Board With Urban Farming
People across the country are getting involved with the urban farming trend. Young people, old people, socially conscious people, gardening lovers, and people who just like to eat. In light of my piece this week, I thought this account of new urban agriculture endeavors in Seattle was pretty interesting.
What stood out to me was the backlash some new projects are getting from the city's transportation department.
Seattle residents interested in the local food movement are getting creative in finding green spaces in areas of unused, urban land. In these overlooked "nooks and crannies," reports SeattlePI, residents are starting to grow their own fresh produce. For example, they're transforming planting strips adjacent to city streets into sources for cheap and healthy food.
But Seattle's Dept. of Transportation say that these impromptu gardens are potential traffic hazards. It also says they could cause health risks. From the article:
[T]he Seattle Transportation Department, which technically requires homeowners to get a street-beautification permit before planting anything there, discourages people from growing food. Among the potential problems: crops tainted with automobile and stormwater pollution; bushy plants spilling into the street; creating a haven for rodents and pooping dogs; and potential complaints ranging from vegetable theft to unsightly dead cornstalks.
However, transportation officials also say that there is no law that specifically prohibits small-scale farming on planting strips.
Furthermore, the Dept. of Transportation hasn't actually done any studies or surveys to find out if their claims about health risks are valid.
Meawhile, many residents seek an alternative to shopping at grocery stores where prices continue to rise. Plus, in inner-city areas, it's difficult to find healthy food even at existing grocers. Residents believe they should be able to grow their own food instead of having to drive long distances to get access to fresh produce (with gas prices being what they are).
What city officials may not realize is that transforming unused bits of land into small-scale farms is the first step to creating a sustainable food system that will not only boost health (rather than presenting a risk to it), but will also boost local economy and the community.
Sumedha Sood is a 2007 fellow in the Academy for Alternative Journalism at Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. The former assistant editor at the Center for American Progress, she is a frequent contributor to WireTap and AlterNet.org.

Pollution problems with local farms
Posted by: smadhuso on Jun 8, 2008 12:29 PM
Actually the city's concern with stormwater pollution may be valid. I am not familiar with how much research the city may or may not have conducted oh the issue, but polluted runoff from stormwater is a significant problem when cities do not have adequate waste disposal facilities or prevention methods. Some of their other concerns do seem asinine, but stormwater pollution (were it shown to impact urban farming plots) would be a hurdle such local farming projects will need to overcome.Also, I liked your previous article on Urban farming catching on. It gave me some good links to follow for a paper I'm writing. Thanks!