Get our most popular stories once a week!
Even young ones are suffering because of this economic crisis that verdict financial crisis. More..."
Posted by Jonas Z in Economic Crisis Hits Schools
muruch posted in Free Association: Sound of Silence
fratman1906 posted in There's No Place Like Home: A History of House Ball Culture
zumbi1165 posted in Silence Broken: How Not to Spoil Obama's Victory
June 24, 2008
N-Word, Please.
(Editor's Note: This originally appeared on Chinaka's blog, Thickwitness.)
In just under a month, Def Jam will release Nasir Jones' ninth studio album. I'm not quite sure what to call it.
For the most part, I've steered clear of the much anticipated and even more debated effort. Nas' iconography is built as much on hype as it is in his discography itself. If I got caught up in every Nasty Nas debate, I'd scarcely have time to memorize Streets Disciple Disc two. I certainly wouldn't have time to play ultimate frisbee with the QB's Finest LP. Considering the mid-nineties funk with Puff Daddy over Hate Me Now, the long term Jay beef turned marketing scheme, the minor squab with 50, and the pomp and circumstance of his marriage to his bossy wife-- my Nassip-o-meter doesn't really peak like yours do. It makes me very little nevermind until he's on my stereo.
Even the debate over the controversial album title didn't get to me until these last few incarnations. So the album was scheduled to be called Nigger. Yeah? As the wholly patriotic Thickwitness you know me to be, I could barely set down my copy of the First Amendment long enough to phone C. Dolores Tucker. Even when I did dial, the line was busy 'cause she was on Sharpton's call waiting.
Not to worry. I'm fairly certain that Nas, Def Jam, and Virgin Megastore are still protected under the Bill of Rights. Plus, how could I possibly be offended before hearing the album? If we negated Dick Gregory's autobiography before cracking the pages, one may never bear witness to the comedic and ethnographic genius therein. I think. I still ain't read the book. Which is why I can't really pass judgment on it.
I should say that everything in my Pan-Africanist upbringing taught against using the word. I don't think I'd even spoken it aloud until I was well into my teenage years-- not even in class read alouds of Mark Twain. Or Joseph Conrad. Or neighborhood rap alongs to Biggie or Jigga or Stevie Wonder. (Yes, even Stevie Wonder has said it on track) In recent history, I must admit that the N-word has made its way into my vocabulary. Not my daily lexicon, but certainly my monthly. And every last time I use it, I feel guilty. The remnants of the word live in my chest as a reminder that I'm somehow betraying my grandmothers-- shame on me.
Conversely, I'm disappointed when tired discourse with which we're all familiar surfaces. We're still asking ourselves: Why affirm a word that holds such dismal history for the descendants of enslaved Africans in this county? What happens if white folks start using it? Will there be a series of VH1 celebreality dedicated to finding the truth?
But for me, Nas' album and the surrounding debate spurn a different set of questions: At which point does an artist gain authority to use a word consistently directed at him? Why are we comfortable hearing the N-word on each of his eight preceding efforts if we can't tolerate it as the title? What if the album, heaven forbid, actually spoke towards The State's niggardly spending on African-American education, health, and general well being? Would it be an acceptable album title then? Is Nas the speaker of his album title, or is it in the voice of say Michael Richards, or that kid on your block? Will there be a Tavis Smiley episode dedicated to paneling the truth?
Both sets of questions, however, fell by the wayside once I heard that he and the label had abandoned his proposed album title. What kind of biyatch move...?
First of all, I'd been looking forward to the release to see if the album could really withstand the enormous responsibility of its moniker. How monumental would it have been if the potential classic began to change the way the hood imagines itself? If it talked about the fact that young black men still feel like niggers -- If the album ignites a much needed discussion in the listenership, and sets down a new framework for evaluating our own complicated self affirmation, n-words just may gain their minds.
But the album isn't going to drop it like that. It's either called Nas or Untitled, depending on who you're asking. And that's what really springs my sprockets. Cause come on, Esco. It's courageous to begin the debate and see it through to the end. It's irresponsible art making if it's just the house that hype built. Which makes me wonder...
Based on my complicated history with the music of Olu Dara's son, I'd have to assume that the album is much more profound than Kelis' beadazzled slur lets on. Using Nas' preceding works as the (cough) blueprint, we can assume that there will be a good deal of autobiography. There will be an indictment or two of the way this country operates. The production will be reflexive of a midnight drive at high speeds down the BQE, and my boy Ramon Cabrera reliving each line as gospel. Nasir is the truth.
I think.
What burns deepest is the possibility that the album title could be swapped out for his own, given name. If the album, years in the making at this point, can easily be renamed-- if each track applies to both Nas and the antecedent title, something's worth inspecting. Is "Nas" a placeholder for "Nigger"? The man who was once God's son? Escobar? Kid Wave? Are we to distill that after nine albums QB isn't far from where it began? What does Nas lose if he becomes the epithet's stand in? What does he stand to gain?
And if the album remains untitled come July 15th, what does it say about our readiness to listen? How does one hear the truth in word, if she is to scared to look at it? Or will a blank spot on the album cover forever point to the word too taboo to say aloud?
Chinaka Hodge is a writer and spoken word artist. Originally from Oakland, California, she is currently the Associate Artistic Director for Youth Speaks. Her work has been featured in numerous outlets, including: Teen People Magazine, The San Francisco Chronicle, The Oakland Tribune, The Annual Women of Color Film Festival and HBO’s Def Poetry Jam. She blogs at Thickwitness.
I agree with you
Posted by: vitablue on Jun 24, 2008 5:17 PM
I think we know the consequences that would come from naming the album Nigger. Nas is supported by big money and the kids that buy the album probably have big money also. Yet, if this album was able to fly without the ban from corporate capitalism, I think Nas could be trying to hit a very crucial problem within communities of color.A tool of the United States has been its ability to appropriate oppressed peoples struggles in order to create a national identity off of the few that were able to make their way out of the "marginalized existence" and into the good graces of the American Life. For example, The further a Black person was able to distance his or her/self from being a Nigger, the more accepted she or he would be. Hampton Univ banning long hair was an attempt to present their student population as above the social ills of Black life, Because the media portrays successful Black people as clean cut, no facial hair, talking with class, and devoid of any kind of history that has shaped that Black person. OBAMA is a poster child for this.
I feel Nas could be trying to challenge this, Because if Obama can't address the realities of poverty, Black life, or the American people, who will?
Oh my.. what IS Nas thinking...
Posted by: oneofmany on Jun 27, 2008 12:37 PM
Firstly, I really enjoyed reading this article.What I find most interesting about this whole topic is that even though this album is not going to be called the N-word anymore, it will still be reviewed by music journalists as an album that Nas was going to call 'the N-word.' So I think somehow Nas has got his way.. even though.. he didnt get his way. I don't really mind that he's pulled out at the last minute, the effects are still here evidently.
I think that in some parallel world, if the title had gone ahead it would make people re-consider why they accept the word in tracks but not as an album title. The thing is, like all racist slang, the N-word splits into two categories of those that use it purely to attack and others that use it in social loopholes where its deemed 'okay'/'a joke'/'cool'. Lots of exciting grey areas. But if people are so shocked by this album-title, then we're confronted by the uncomfortable truth that we'll accept a racist word as long as it fits certain 'social terms and conditions'. Am I wrong?
Maybe these are the intentions Nas had... maybe the album will reveal these kind of debates... maybe I'm completely off the radar.. Who knows until we listen to it.
But personally, I won't guess too much at what he tried to provoke with the title. I'm just glad people are forced to have a dialogue about it, haters and lovers of the word alike. Even though I find that debates on the 'N-word' can go a little haywire - its better than brushing it under the carpet as an 'old problem' or something thats already been dealt with.
After all, if it is such an 'old problem', none of us would even blink an eye if Nas brought out an album called 'N*****', would we?